It’s a common consensus among experienced people dealing
with CUI that dry insulation
systems simply don't exist in the long run. They
therefore tend to be regarded as a bad influence. In addition, people have
believed for decades that cladding/jacketing is 100 percent weatherproof and,
in combination with elevated service temperatures, that water or moisture could
never get trapped. This idea resulted in many cases in which piping, other that
the basic shop primer, wasn't even extra coated.Cladding/jacketing is primarily designed as weatherproofing and not as a vapor barrier. Depending on service temperature and ambient conditions, condensation within the insulation system may not be avoidable, and therefore needs to be addressed in the engineering phase. In other situations, water enters into the insulation system through failed or broken cladding/jacketing. This can be caused by:
- Foot traffic
- Inadequate design
- Incorrect installation
- An insufficient maintenance strategy
Overlooking all possible CUI causes in relation to a consequence of the failure of piping systems or equipment, there's a justification for challenging the need for insulation.
The oil crisis during the 1970s brought new insights on energy savings and resulted in other design criteria for thermal insulation for the (petro)chemical industry. In some cases, this resulted in excessive insulating, which was not always economically feasible. However, recent geopolitical CO2 reduction goals persuaded many asset-owners to re-evaluate these old goals and translate them into new company policies.
Below is a flow diagram that provides a few logical steps to
understand whether insulation is necessary or could be replaced.
For more information, visit our website at www.leopad.com
Source:http://www.corrosionpedia.com/2/1372/corrosion/corrosion-under-insulation-the-challenge-and-need-for-insulation
No comments:
Post a Comment